Lena@gregtech.eu to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agoGithub > youtubegregtech.euexternal-linkmessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1501arrow-down114
arrow-up1487arrow-down1external-linkGithub > youtubegregtech.euLena@gregtech.eu to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square31fedilink
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 months agoThere are better backends though.
minus-squareprettybunnys@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months agoBetter in what way? There are certainly others but … git is the defacto standard for a reason. There are certainly use cases for others, just wondering what you mean?
minus-squarerhabarba@feddit.orgcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 months ago Git is for bazaar-style development. However, most of my own projects are cathedral-style. Git’s default user experience (CLI command syntax, for example) is weird. There are reasons why Git GUIs are popular and (e.g.) SVN GUIs never were. Git is rather spammy in terms of hard disk usage.
There are better backends though.
Better in what way?
There are certainly others but … git is the defacto standard for a reason.
There are certainly use cases for others, just wondering what you mean?