No. It would be in character to give him money if his character wasn’t greedy or an asshole. It would also be in character for him to find the local Lord who overtaxed him into poverty, burn down his manor house, and steal his dog.
No. It would be in character to give him money if his character wasn’t greedy or an asshole. It would also be in character for him to find the local Lord who overtaxed him into poverty, burn down his manor house, and steal his dog.
That’s what the remaster looks like? That looks like total dog shit. I’ve seen better looking flash games, back when those were still a thing, before all the flash game makers ported and enshitified their once free games and made them P2W mobile apps or worse, charge for them on steam. I’m looking at you, Bloons trash.
You goddamn rubes. You’ve fucked us all.
This makes me feel like I did the first time I saw a full blood moon. Amused but ultimately disappointed that the world didn’t end.
Time for Godot to get off Twitter.
Who would consider an IPA to be intense?
When cats bring you food, mice, birds, etc. it’s because they think you’re an especially stupid cat, but they like you enough to keep trying to take care of/teach you.
Honestly I don’t think this should be a crime.
Single ply, extra thin, just like our corporate overlords intended it.
War is not cosplay kid. Now get serious and go slaughter some Ruski troopers.
Clearly you’ve never actually met a bard before. Haven’t you ever wondered where half orcs come from? It’s bards, always bards. Every. Single. Goddamn. Time.
Will they bring glory to me and my house?
Hard Right nationalists: who the hell do you think you are, trying to slow down the apocalypse?
Okay, yellow shirt guy? Turn 90° right. Thanks.
What have I told you? People are a renewable resource!
It’s fuel efficiency sure is.
Why put up a Green Man face when instead you can add this unsettling collage.
They must have bought the couplings on Temu.
That house is straight-up modern art. It belongs in a museum.
Jury nullification should not be a banned topic. It’s perfectly legal and is the only direct way citizens can object to interpretations of the law. The very fact that the courts and government don’t want people to know of it is a testament to its effectiveness in cases where the public will opposes the government in matters of law. Particularly when public opinion differs drastically from a strict interpretation of the law, but most especially when citizens find a law, its often limited proponents, or its execution to be objectionable, unconscionable, cruel, or unwilling to take circumstances into consideration. It’s crucial for us to all understand our limited power over the government, especially when it’s acting in an oppressive manner, violating human rights, ignoring the principle of justice in favor of a literal interpretation, or is otherwise objectionable by the majority of citizens as opposed to the minority of lawmakers.