We literally are at the stage where when someone says: “this is a psyop” then that is the psyop. When someone says: “these drag queens are groomers” they are the groomers. When someone says: “the establishment wants to keep you stupid and poor” they are the establishment who want to keep you stupid and poor.

Perhaps more likely years of work with colour and colour theory preceding a quick output of some content? Why the sarcastic tone?

Two body problem.

Is this real though? Does ChatGPT just literally take whole snippets of texts like that? I thought it used some aggregate or probability based on the whole corpus of text it was trained on.

Whentember juneteenth

Agreed. Reddit now has ai generated echo chambers.

Echo chambers were literally the biggest issue with that site. Now it chatGPTs itself?

Ew.

Andy was right. It’s an amazing comeback story.

QA brought to you by ChatGPT.

Okay but are they delicious?

Found the round-earther.

I too have underestimated the glee of right wing trolls at twitters turn around. They are keeping it alive somehow.

Oh I’m aware. 40 going on 90.

Incorrect. 15 years in the industry here. Good day.

deleted by creator

I said good day.

Dunno man. People shred me for saying “please” and “thank you” to Siri.

Millennials claiming to be “old” is exactly the same as a preteen being eight and a half!

I’m not going to bother arguing with you but for anyone reading this: the poster above is making a bad faith semantic argument.

In the strictest technical terms AI, ML and Deep Learning are district, and they have specific applications.

This insufferable asshat is arguing that since they all use fuel, fire and air they are all engines. Which’s isn’t wrong but it’s also not the argument we are having.

@OP good day.