Realistically, fire ant

To publish, to perish, a choice is naught
For tenure is the very thing I want

A paper full of garbage data stacked
Statistically massaged supports our grant

The samples gathered on the bench anon
Support my new hypothesis by morn

Lol, 39 comments on vegantheoryclub, 26 when viewed from hexbear, over a hundred on .ml, the .world crowd is upset.

Extra passive headline voice:

A sample was seen and collection happened. The scientists deny any testing.

It’s the first to go from concussions

bright sun

bask

content

Have you played with fire recently?

warm rock

good

Yeah Yeah Yeahs - Heads Will Roll

smoke weed every day

It’s back https://www.techradar.com/pro/security/funding-for-the-critical-cve-security-detection-system-renewed-just-hours-before-deadline

this must have been embedded in my subconscious

This is sticking your dick in a toaster levels of stupid

Ooooooooooooooooooh shiiiiiiiiiiit that’s not good

Like, for anybody who already understands that everything to do with computers talking to each other is basically held together with spit and tape, they’re defunding the tape

CVE is THE definitive central source for “fix this potential hack now plz”–at least for things the US thought was too dangerous to keep secret for their own sneaky purposes. Oldheads may remember getting alerts from CERT.

I assume, being a public-facing service, that it wasn’t profitable and therefore it’s inefficient.

Like, EU CVD/CSIRT will undoubtedly step in to close that gap, but burning this is insane.

Buy a gun and learn to use it

Ask China to pay for it

Idk that I can agree, but I can respect your viewpoint without agreeing with it. Personally, I’m a little too far to the “an” side of ancom to vibe with prevailing thoughts about the lumpenproletariat. Like, folks who want to just exist should be supported in that endeavour to any extent that it’s feasible–and where not feasible, while not actively supported, they shouldn’t be actively opposed or punished. “Lazy”, with its strictly negative connotations, feels kinda punishing.

Though, again, I would support applying it to someone who seeks status and standing without applying effort; I just rarely if ever see it applied in that manner and would lean toward abolishing the term rather than engage in the effort to define it as such–which I suppose is lazy behavior by both definitions.