Are you a Trevor Moore fan? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TxjrHPHypA
I make art that’s totally mine because I did it through AI. https://imgur.com/a/Rhgi0OC
Are you a Trevor Moore fan? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TxjrHPHypA
I’ll watch anything with Nate Bargatze in it. I actually wanted to vote for Mary’s idea as well.
Mine wasn’t, it was a university known for being one of the best for economics and had huge classes. I did not do well in that class. It was an advanced 101 class.
Thanks for taking the time to respond. IMO, economics has some easy concepts that are hidden behind terms. Every industry has it, but all this info is kind of hidden anyway for a noob like me.
That’s great info, thanks. I’ll pursue that angle next time.
This? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D55LkspO5ZU
We were shown this, but it’s not specifically about the war and more about racism:
Jane Elliott “Blue Eyes - Brown Eyes” Experiment Anti-Racism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLAi78hluFc
https://sh.itjust.works/post/37116488
Did you see my first crack at it? I would love your input. I think the “Real GDP” might be not adjusted for inflation? I can’t tell.
Although I think it’s great to track that too, I don’t think that includes wage earnings and such. Like for the Big Mac Index by the Economist listed. the price of a Big Mac doesn’t say much about the income levels of who is buying it. It seems to be more focused on the cost of production instead of the person buying it. Minimum wage is still so low across the country and hasn’t been raised for so long, that the price could be kept low. Again, not an economist, but that’s my insecure take.
Whelp, here you go. It only does a quarterly GDP or “real income” analysis.
https://sh.itjust.works/post/37116488
I’m not much a math person or econ person. Do you have any ideas on what that would like like? The Econ professor in the video said the real income is aka GDP. He was loosely speaking though, so I don’t know if that’s a one to one. I guess I could put something up and people will tell me how it’s wrong? I don’t mind that.
Make as many accounts as you want. In fact, it’s sort of encouraged because you want a back up if one of your instances go down.
Do you have memories as a kid where it was pure fun and no expectations? I honestly think that there are 4 types of personalities that people lean towards:
Dogs, dog owners, dog guardians and cats
The dogs just want to have fun, work hard for their owners and play in the back yard.
The dog and cat owners can be cruel, great, fun, abusive, etc., but always have rules that the dog is constantly trying to guess what they are. The cat doesn’t care.
The dog and cat guardians are gudes to everyone around them
The cats are what everyone knows about cats.
The dogs and the dog/cat guardians look for meaning in their life.
Do you have the formula for that? I might be up for doing that here on Lemmy locally once a month or so.
I disagree, both are engaged enough to show up. Some can’t afford to take off work, that’s the reality in the US right now.
I edited this in, but you might have missed it. He’s saying real income is equal to the GDP. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAZxLm6M_V0
Remember, this is a work day. Don’t count the number or compare to Hands Off, just be appreciative of the people who showed up.
Also, Jesus probably meant for this rule to end for adherents of Christianity.
I mean, Jesus was Jewish and he wouldn’t have called his followers Christians because he hadn’t died on a cross yet. He would have called them his Jewish brothers and his followers would have done the same for decades afterwards. He was the leader of a sect of Judaism.
Yeah, this article seems like an anti-Wikipedia article. They’re just using it for translation, spelling errors, content quality, etc.
Wikipedia’s model of collective knowledge generation has demonstrated its ability to create verifiable and neutral encyclopedic knowledge. The Wikipedian community and WMF have long used AI to support the work of volunteers while centering the role of the human. Today we use AI to support editors to detect vandalism on all Wikipedia sites, translate content for readers, predict article quality, quantify the readability of articles, suggest edits to volunteers, and beyond. We have done so following Wikipedia’s values around community governance, transparency, support of human rights, open source, and others. That said, we have modestly applied AI to the editing experience when opportunities or technology presented itself. However, we have not undertaken a concerted effort to improve the editing experience of volunteers with AI, as we have chosen not to prioritize it over other opportunities.
Yeah, our smug cloud has completely dissipated. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmG64mVQV3g
I understand what he’s saying, he’s saying that the followers believe something different.
I’m saying none of that matters. It’s like being Catholic versus Lutheran, but Jewish vs. other Jewish that thinks Jesus was the Messiah. Still Jewish for at least decades, probably centuries.
They believed that while he was still alive. We know this because he and his disciples celebrated Passover at the last supper and they thought he was the messiah while he was alive.